Archive for January, 2009

Date: January 28th, 2009
Cate: Jerk of the Week

Jerk of the Week: Baz Luhrmann

I saw Baz Luhrmann’s Australia on the weekend – it was the Australia Day weekend after all. As a consequence Baz is Jerk of the week for simply making such a crap film.

Why was the film crap? Three reasons:

  1. Racist. Why didn’t you just tattoo “nobel savage” on the forehead of the Aboriginal Grandfather? Little known fact: Aboriginals have been known to stand on two legs from time to time.
  2. Why would you make that film in 2008? I don’t understand why you would make an Australian Gone with the Wind 40 years after that era. Shouldn’t we be looking forward? Should we be trying to do something new? Let’s innovate a little.
  3. Australia has always been an urban, coastal country. Baz has managed to add himself to the long list of people that perpetuate the myth that all Australians are drovers and probably have pet Kangaroos. We have never been like that and it’s not a productive mythology. Why can we present Australia the way it has always been, a very urban country.

All that said, the film was pretty.

In case you missed it, here’s what Germaine Greer had to say about it.

And here’s Marcia Langton’s reply to Greer.

Date: January 21st, 2009
Cate: Jerk of the Week

Jerk of the Week: Lleyton Hewitt

What can I say, he’s always given me the shits. “Come on”, hand to the forehead looking like an emu. Cheering the opposition’s mistakes – never a good look.

Problem is he’s a nobody these days. Ranked 80th (I think), knocked out of his home tournament in the first round, but he still attracts front page headlines.

So Lley, you’re jerk of the week, just retire gracefully and get off the front page of the paper. Then again, he never won gracefully so maybe that’s a little too much to ask.

Date: January 13th, 2009
Cate: Travel

I must be in a communist country

Having just returned from seeing Ho Chi Minh, in the flesh literally, I thought I’d share with you this incredible piece of propaganda:

The Mausoleum of President Ho Chi Minh is an architectural work of great political and ideological significance, expressing the profound feelings of the entire Vietnamese people towards the Late President who is endearingly called Uncle Ho. In this place the Vietnamese, generation after generation, have arrived to pay homage and show gratitude to President Ho Chi Minh and express thier determination to follow the revolutionary path He had charted to build a peaceful, united, democratic and prosperous Vietnam.

It’s written in the best English I’ve seen in Vietnam.

While we’re on ‘Uncle Ho’, was he a benevolent dictator? To my knowledge (and this is based largely on what I’m learning in Vietnam), there were no Railway Purges, Gulags, Cultural Revolutions or other acts of genocide and the likes. There was some land distribution that pissed a couple of people off but otherwise it was just everyone else committing atrocities on the Vietnamese (the Chinese over thousands of years and more recently the Cambodians and Americans).

Can anyone tell me of human rights violations committed by Ho? He even seemed quite tolerant of religion.