Comments on: Bare Back Mounting http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/ Between the spelling mistakes and typos on this web page, you'll find Goonanism. Not unrelated to the phrase "go onanism", Goonanism is my take on what ever I like it to be a take on - including Chuck Norris and Competitive Eating. Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:30:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: m!key http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-407 m!key Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:49:54 +0000 http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-407 You thieving bastardo <b>hammy</b>! No wonder I've got no comments on my blog at the moment: You've stolen them all! ;-) ...make that 23... PS: <i>Overcoming</i> is on at that Nova, unless it's finished and you've missed it for good... :-P Enjoy. You thieving bastardo hammy! No wonder I’ve got no comments on my blog at the moment: You’ve stolen them all! ;-)

…make that 23…

PS: Overcoming is on at that Nova, unless it’s finished and you’ve missed it for good… :-P Enjoy.

]]> By: Hammy http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-406 Hammy Fri, 24 Feb 2006 06:31:22 +0000 http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-406 Tough call, I'd have to go with Heath if the truth be known, but I'm quite fond of Jake. He's also more honest. Tough call, I’d have to go with Heath if the truth be known, but I’m quite fond of Jake.

He’s also more honest.

]]> By: tezza http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-405 tezza Fri, 24 Feb 2006 05:57:56 +0000 http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-405 Rambo had no homoerotic undertones. It was the story of an misunderstood misanthropic genuis. All he wanted was to be loved. Btw, no couching with me allowed. I am too special for that. hammy, so who did you prefer heath or jake? Rambo had no homoerotic undertones.

It was the story of an misunderstood misanthropic genuis. All he wanted was to be loved.

Btw, no couching with me allowed. I am too special for that.

hammy, so who did you prefer heath or jake?

]]> By: Mad Hatter http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-404 Mad Hatter Fri, 24 Feb 2006 05:34:29 +0000 http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-404 So it takes a little gay film bashing to get people posting...interesting. For the record I thought it was rather fab - and I concur on Transamerica but have yet to see Capote...after all that I might have to join you and Tezza on the couch with Rambo - although i'm almost certain that had homoerotic undertones too... So it takes a little gay film bashing to get people posting…interesting.

For the record I thought it was rather fab - and I concur on Transamerica but have yet to see Capote…after all that I might have to join you and Tezza on the couch with Rambo - although i’m almost certain that had homoerotic undertones too…

]]> By: Terry Johal http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-403 Terry Johal Fri, 24 Feb 2006 03:44:32 +0000 http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-403 hammy, i understand it all now. damn my sexy self. also, the point you all are missing is that 'top gun' is the best gay themed film ever. Ever. hammy,

i understand it all now. damn my sexy self.

also, the point you all are missing is that ‘top gun’ is the best gay themed film ever. Ever.

]]> By: rich http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-402 rich Fri, 24 Feb 2006 02:31:40 +0000 http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-402 what about the final bit ...in the caravan, with the jacket.... b.t.w hi libs what about the final bit …in the caravan, with the jacket….

b.t.w hi libs

]]> By: Hammy http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-401 Hammy Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:56:49 +0000 http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-401 I love Ang Lee as well for what it's worth, however this just added to my disappointment. I maintain: piece of shit. How ever this is now the 17th comment on this post making it a record number of comments for a post - this makes me happy. I love Ang Lee as well for what it’s worth, however this just added to my disappointment.

I maintain: piece of shit.

How ever this is now the 17th comment on this post making it a record number of comments for a post - this makes me happy.

]]> By: lib http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-400 lib Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:26:01 +0000 http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-400 gee wizz. Hammy I think there's something you're not admitting to here. What was your problem? I thought the movie was pretty damn good. But I really like Ang Lee so was a little swayed anyway. But the THEMES Hammy. The whole film was so fucken torn. That's what made it GOOD, be they gay or not. Hell, I'm even doing a movement piece (shut up I'm allowed to be artsy fartsy, after all I'm at drama school) based on the mother's character. That scene at the end, in her home, was resonating. gee wizz. Hammy I think there’s something you’re not admitting to here. What was your problem? I thought the movie was pretty damn good. But I really like Ang Lee so was a little swayed anyway. But the THEMES Hammy. The whole film was so fucken torn. That’s what made it GOOD, be they gay or not. Hell, I’m even doing a movement piece (shut up I’m allowed to be artsy fartsy, after all I’m at drama school) based on the mother’s character. That scene at the end, in her home, was resonating.

]]> By: Hammy http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-399 Hammy Thu, 23 Feb 2006 05:46:36 +0000 http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-399 I thought that was a given. I thought that was a given.

]]> By: Terry Johal http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-398 Terry Johal Thu, 23 Feb 2006 05:41:40 +0000 http://goonanism.com/blog/2006/02/21/bare-back-mounting/#comment-398 why do you have to take everything to its <strike>bareback</strike> brokenback conclusion? do you like fully have a thing for me? i would understand. why do you have to take everything to its bareback brokenback conclusion?

do you like fully have a thing for me? i would understand.

]]>